###
DOI:
电力大数据:2024,27(4):-
←前一篇   |   后一篇→
本文二维码信息
新型电力系统下虚拟电厂参与电-碳联合市场的竞标策略与价格传导机制
郁海彬1, 袁欣诚1, 唐亮1, 魏梦飒2, 沈捷1, 李前征3, 张煜晨2
(1.国网上海市电力公司市北供电公司;2.国网上海市电力公司松江供电公司;3.福建大唐国际宁德发电有限责任公司)
Bidding strategy and price transmission mechanism of virtual power plants participating in the electricity carbon joint market under the new power system
Yu Haibin1, Yuan Xincheng1, Tang Liang1, Wei Mengsa2, Shen Jie1, Li Qianzheng3, Zhang Yuchen2
(1.State Grid Shanghai Electric Power Company Shibei Power Supply Company;2.State Grid Shanghai Electric Power Company Songjiang Power Supply Company;3.Fujian Datang International Ningde Power Generation)
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 53次   下载 79
投稿时间:2024-05-15    修订日期:2024-06-29
中文摘要: 以针对目前电力市场(electricity market,EM)与碳市场(Carbon market,CM)未能协同增效为出发点的问题,两市场间通过价格传导机制相互作用于市场主体,并通过电-碳联合市场的协同机制完善两市场独立运行的不足,。本文梳理了电-碳市场的交互机理和价格传导效应,由虚拟电厂运营商(Virtual Power Plant Operator ,VPPO) 制定对外参与电-碳联合市场竞标、对内协调优化决策的双侧互动策略。,构建包含风电(Wind turbine,WT)、光伏发电(Photovoltaic power,PV)、燃气轮机(Gas turbine,GT)、储能(Stored energy,ES)、电动汽车(electric vehicle,EV)及柔性负荷(Flexible load,FL)的多主体虚拟电厂VPP模型参与电-碳联合市场, 虚拟电厂运营商VPPO竞标策略根据电-碳价、竞标电量-碳排放量通过制定燃气轮机GT、柔性负荷FL、电-碳价、电量-碳排放量的动态博弈及储能、电动汽车ES、EV的运行补偿机制参与进行竞标动态博弈。算例表明电-碳联合市场下虚拟电厂VPP内部DER 分布式资源的积极性优于各主体独立参与市场,不同区域电网碳排放因子对虚拟电厂VPP影响水平存在差异,碳-电价传导率的提升有利于当前电力市场EM效能和碳减排效果,为碳价机制设计提供理论引导。
Abstract:Starting from the problem of the current lack of synergy between the electricity market and the carbon market, this article summarizes the interaction mechanism and price transmission effect of the electricity carbon market. The Virtual Power Plant Operator (VPPO) formulates a bilateral interaction strategy for external participation in the electricity carbon joint market bidding and internal coordination and optimization decision-making. A multi-agent virtual power plant model is constructed, including wind power, photovoltaic power generation, gas turbines, energy storage, electric vehicles, and flexible loads. The bidding strategy is dynamically played based on the electricity carbon price, bidding electricity carbon emissions, and the operation compensation mechanism of energy storage and electric vehicles. The calculation example shows that the enthusiasm of distributed resources within virtual power plants in the electricity carbon joint market is better than that of independent participation of various entities in the market. There are differences in the impact level of carbon emission factors on virtual power plants in different regional power grids. The improvement of carbon electricity price conductivity is beneficial to the current electricity market efficiency and carbon reduction effect, providing theoretical guidance for the design of carbon pricing mechanisms.
文章编号:     中图分类号:    文献标志码:
基金项目:国网上海市电力公司科学技术项目(SGTYHT/21-JS-223)
引用文本: